Mets vs Chicago Cubs Match Player Stats: Pete Crow-Armstrong Haunts New York as Cubs Complete Season Sweep

Searching for the complete Mets vs Chicago Cubs match player stats from the June 25, 2026 series finale? New York’s spiraling season hit another low point as the Cubs completed a four-game sweep — and their seventh consecutive win over the Mets in 2026 — with a gut-punch 4–3 extra-innings victory at Citi Field.

The problem is real, the evidence is damning, and the numbers tell the full story of a Cubs side operating with disciplined efficiency against a Mets roster plagued by errors, missed runners in scoring position, and a bullpen that buckled when it mattered most.

The Lead: One Final Twist of the Knife at Citi Field

Thursday, June 25, 2026 — Citi Field, Flushing, Queens — 36,035 fans arrived hoping to see the New York Mets arrest a six-game losing streak and avoid a four-game sweep. Instead, they watched Pete Crow-Armstrong, the man their own franchise once drafted in the first round, lace a walk-off RBI double to right field in the 10th inning, sending the Chicago Cubs home with a 4–3 victory and a perfect 4–0 series record. The Cubs finished 7–0 against the Mets for the 2026 season, outscoring them 51–24 across both series, cementing their total dominance of this particular NL rivalry.

The game itself was tighter than the wider series narrative suggested. Freddy Peralta pitched 5.2 innings of unearned-run ball for New York, and pinch-hitter Eric Wagaman delivered a two-run homer in the sixth to claw the Mets back into a 3–3 tie. But the Cubs’ bullpen — headlined by a lockdown 10th from Trent Thornton, who earned his first career save — was simply cleaner than New York’s. Brooks Raley surrendered the decisive hit to Crow-Armstrong with the automatic runner on, sealing the loss (2–3) and the sweep. The Mets dropped to 34–47, a season-high 13 games under .500, their deepest submersion since the final day of 2023.

Match Overview Table

Core Match Statistics Overview

Team Stats Comparison

Pitching Efficiency

• The Cubs pitching staff held the Mets to zero earned runs across 10 innings. Every run Chicago conceded was triggered by defensive breakdowns — Dansby Swanson’s 5th error of the season in the 6th, and errors from Carson Benge and Ronny Mauricio in the same frame.
• New York’s collective pitching staff struck out eight Cubs hitters but issued six walks, creating unnecessary traffic that ultimately cost them the game in the 10th inning.

Runners Left on Base — The Decisive Gap

• The Mets left 22 runners on base, a genuinely staggering total for a 10-inning game. Seven were left in scoring position with two outs, representing the clearest single indicator of New York’s offensive dysfunction.
• The Cubs left 15 on base, but their small-ball execution — manufacturing the automatic runner into a winning run in the 10th — showed far sharper situational awareness.

Error-Driven Runs

• Chicago’s entire four-run total was built on unearned runs. The Cubs did not record a single earned run against New York’s pitching — yet still won. That is as sharp a indictment of the Mets’ defense as any number can provide.
• New York committed two errors in a single half-inning (the pivotal 6th), directly gifting the Cubs a 3–2 lead they then defended.

Inning-by-Inning Analysis

Innings 1–5: Peralta and Boyd Keep It Scoreless

• Matthew Boyd made his return from a May 6 knee injury and delivered 4.2 innings of genuinely impressive work — surrendering four hits and four walks but none of the eight baserunners scored, a testament to his groundball tendencies (6 GB to 3 FB on the night).
• Freddy Peralta matched him pitch-for-pitch through five, striking out six Cubs in that span and giving the Mets exactly the start they needed. His 98-pitch effort (54 strikes) was efficient by his 2026 standards.
• The Mets created their best early threat in the third, loading the bases for Mark Vientos with one out, but he fouled out to third to end the inning — an early preview of New York’s LOB problem.

6th Inning: Chaos Swings Both Ways

• Ronny Mauricio’s throwing error in the top of the sixth opened the door, allowing Dansby Swanson to reach base and set off an unearned three-run inning for Chicago.
• Pinch-hitter Eric Wagaman answered immediately with a two-run shot to left, his 2nd home run of 2026, dramatically halving the deficit in one swing.
• The Mets then loaded the bases but couldn’t push ahead, and Chicago responded with a third run before the inning closed — all three Cubs runs unearned.

7th Inning: Jared Young Ties It

• Jared Young’s 6th home run of the season, a solo shot off Phil Maton to right-center field, tied the game 3–3 and gave the Citi Field crowd brief optimism.
• It was the only hit the Mets recorded in the 7th, and the inning ended there — a lone punch that failed to become a counterpunch.

Innings 8–9: Bullpens Lock Down

• Luke Weaver struck out the side in the 8th for the Mets, his finest moment of the night (only 11 pitches, 10 for strikes).
• Jacob Webb worked around a ninth-inning walk and a Swanson throwing error to keep it level. Devin Williams set the Cubs down in order in the bottom of the frame.

10th Inning: Crow-Armstrong Delivers the Dagger

• Matt Shaw entered as a pinch runner for automatic runner Miguel Amaya, and Pete Crow-Armstrong drove him home with a double to right off Brooks Raley — a former Mets connection delivering maximum irony.
• Trent Thornton retired all three Mets hitters he faced in the bottom of the 10th — Wagaman, Baty, and Benge — using just 10 pitches, earning the first save of his career.

Detailed Team Player Statistics

Chicago Cubs Player Statistics

Pete Crow-Armstrong — CF

Crow-Armstrong was the headline act from first pitch to final out. His 13th double of the season came in the most decisive moment of the game, plating the winning run against his former organization. His season OPS of .888 puts him firmly in the NL’s elite center field conversation for 2026.

Alex Bregman — 3B

Bregman’s 11th double of the season in the sixth inning was a two-out RBI hit that extended the Cubs’ lead, and he advanced to third on Benge’s fielding error — manufacturing the extra-base impact that separated a strong hit from a game-changing sequence.

Michael Conforto — RF

Conforto’s shallow single to right was the catalyst for the sixth-inning rally, scoring Swanson for the Cubs’ first run of the game. His season RBI total now stands at 15, and his situational hitting in pressure moments has been a quiet strength for Craig Counsell’s lineup.

Ian Happ — LF

Happ’s two-out RBI in the sixth — his 38th of the season — was one of the more important situational hits of the game, pushing the Cubs to 3–2 before Wagaman’s homer temporarily halted their momentum. His .800 OPS represents solid production from the left side.

Matthew Boyd — SP

Boyd’s return from a left knee injury was a quietly impressive performance. He put eight runners on base but prevented all of them from scoring, relying on his groundball tendencies and slow-developing sequencing to negate the Mets’ baserunners. At 76 pitches (46 strikes), he gave the Cubs exactly what they needed from an innings-eater returning from the IL.

New York Mets Player Statistics

Freddy Peralta — SP

Peralta’s performance was genuinely good — zero earned runs through 5.2 innings, 5 strikeouts, 98 pitches. He was beaten by defensive calamity behind him, not his own arm. His game ERA actually dropped on the night, which tells you everything about how badly the Mets let him down.

Eric Wagaman — PH/1B

Wagaman’s pinch-hit two-run home run to left field in the sixth inning was the single most dramatic individual moment of the game. It erased a two-run deficit in one swing and temporarily shifted the entire energy inside Citi Field. His two-out RBI numbers are beginning to stand out as a genuine skill.

Jared Young — LF

Young’s solo home run to right-center in the seventh tied the game at 3 and was the moment the Mets could have stolen a win. He reached base in both his plate appearances — a walk and the homer — showcasing the kind of selective aggression the rest of the Mets lineup sorely lacked.

Juan Soto — DH

Soto reached base three times and remains New York’s lone consistent elite offensive threat. But with the Mets stranding 22 runners, even his two walks went to waste. His .966 OPS is elite; his team’s inability to drive him in is the Mets’ most pressing recurring storyline.

Statistical Leaders Summary Table

Analytical Breakdowns: Why the Cubs Won and Why the Mets Lost

Why Chicago Cubs Won

Exploiting Defensive Errors Ruthlessly

Every single run the Cubs scored was unearned. That sounds like fortunate baseball — and it partly was — but it also reflects Chicago’s ability to keep rallies alive, stay in at-bats, and punish any mistake. When Mauricio’s throw sailed and Benge’s route broke down in right, Chicago had hitters at the plate ready to pounce.

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s Walk-Off Execution

Against the automatic-runner rule, squaring contact on a first pitch fastball and driving it to right gap is exactly how the format is supposed to be beaten.

Bullpen Efficiency at Peak Moment

The Cubs used five relievers across the final 5.1 innings. Caleb Thielbar (2 K), Jacob Webb (9th inning hold in a crisis), and Trent Thornton (10th, 3 up / 3 down, 10 pitches) combined to allow zero runs after Matthew Boyd exited. New York could not solve any of them.

Distributing the Offensive Load

No Cubs player hit a home run. No single player had more than 2 hits. Yet four different players drove in the four runs. This distribution — Conforto, Bregman, Happ, and Crow-Armstrong each contributing one RBI — is the hallmark of a lineup that wins without requiring one player to carry the night.

Why the New York Mets Lost

A Catastrophic 22 Runners Left on Base

Twenty-two runners left on base in a 10-inning game is not an aberration — it is a systemic diagnosis. Vientos alone stranded five, Baty stranded three, and Soto was left on base three times despite reaching base with all three of his productive at-bats. The Mets had the raw material to win this game multiple times and could not convert.

Defensive Meltdown in the Decisive Inning

Both errors came in the same inning, the same rally. Peralta pitched out of trouble all evening, but his defense dismantled his own 5.2-inning quality start. Two errors in six batters is unacceptable at the MLB level and was the direct cause of the Mets trailing 3–2 despite out-hitting the Cubs 9–6.

Brooks Raley Surrenders the Series-Clinching Hit

Raley is a solid bullpen arm with a 2.40 ERA, but the 10th-inning automatic-runner situation exposed him. One pitch, one swing, one series ending. The Mets had no margin for error in extras and their closer was not at his best.

Historical Context & Advanced Insights

2026 Season Series: Cubs vs Mets

Chicago outscored New York 51–24 across all seven matchups in 2026. The Mets have not won a single game against the Cubs this season, and the run differential of +27 for Chicago represents one of the most lopsided NL head-to-head records of the entire season.

Dansby Swanson’s Extraordinary Series Context

Swanson’s 15 RBIs in the first three games of this series tied the Cubs’ franchise record for any series of any length. He went 0-for-4 in Game 4, yet the Cubs won anyway — illustrating their lineup depth. When your shortstop can go hitless and the team still takes the series game, it speaks to genuine offensive balance.

Advanced Insight: Crow-Armstrong’s June Surge

Pete Crow-Armstrong arrived at this series batting .437 in June with 9 home runs and 14 RBIs for the month, having won back-to-back NL Player of the Week awards. His current season line of .287/.367/.521 — an OPS of .888 — with 45 RBIs places him as a legitimate NL All-Star consideration. His former club drafted him first in 2021 before including him in the Javier Báez trade. June 25, 2026 was perhaps the sharpest illustration of how wrong that transaction looks now.

Unearned Run Rate: A Deep Dive

The Cubs scored 51 total runs in the seven 2026 meetings with the Mets. Per game averages:

New York’s defensive miscues have directly amplified Chicago’s run total in every matchup. The Mets’ fielding percentage has been visibly inconsistent this season, and no team has exploited that more efficiently than the Cubs.

Game Implications & Key Lessons

What This Means for the Chicago Cubs

• Moving to 44–37, the Cubs remain in legitimate NL Wild Card contention and are applying pressure on the NL Central leaders. A 7–0 season record against a divisional rival-adjacent opponent builds the kind of run-differential cushion that matters in September standings races.
• Pete Crow-Armstrong’s emergence as a genuine star — .287/.367/.521 with 45 RBIs at this stage of the season — gives Craig Counsell an offensive anchor alongside Dansby Swanson’s capacity for historic RBI runs.
• The pitching staff’s ability to allow zero earned runs in a game while still permitting nine hits demonstrates a rare kind of situational resilience that holds up in elimination-style baseball.

What This Means for the New York Mets

• Falling to 34–47 and 13 games under .500 represents a crisis point. The Mets are now further below .500 than at any point since the end of the 2023 season, and the schedule offers no gentle remedy with the Phillies next.
• The 22-runner LOB total and the continued inability to convert RISP situations are not random noise at this point — they are patterns. New York’s lineup, despite containing Juan Soto (.966 OPS), lacks the depth to drive its own stars home.
• Defensively, the Mets committed two errors in a single inning for the second time in four games, undermining otherwise quality pitching from Freddy Peralta. Infield defense remains the most urgent structural problem.

Key Lessons from Cubs 4, Mets 3

• Pitching alone does not win games — Freddy Peralta allowed zero earned runs and still lost. Defense and situational hitting matter equally.
• The automatic runner in extra innings rewards teams that hit the ball hard early in at-bats. Crow-Armstrong saw one pitch before driving in the walk-off. That is not luck; it is preparation.
• Runs left on base compound over a series. New York left 22 in this single game and 51–24 is the season-long scoring differential. The LOB problem is the Mets’ season in miniature.
• No-name contributions win games. Eric Wagaman’s pinch-hit homer and Jared Young’s tie-breaking blast came from depth players — and yet it still wasn’t enough because the Cubs distributed their offense across four contributors.
• Error prevention is a form of offense. The Mets’ two errors gifted Chicago three runs they did not earn. Fielding clean is not optional at this level; it is a scoring mechanism in disguise.
• A bullpen built on depth beats a bullpen built on one closer. The Cubs cycled through Boyd, Roberts, Milner, Maton, Thielbar, Webb, and Thornton; New York’s chain ended at Raley, who surrendered the decisive hit.

FAQ: Mets vs Chicago Cubs Match Player Stats — June 25, 2026

Who won the Cubs vs Mets game on June 25, 2026?

The Chicago Cubs won 4–3 in 10 innings at Citi Field, Flushing, Queens. The victory completed a four-game series sweep and extended the Cubs’ perfect 2026 record against the Mets to 7–0.

Who had the best player stats in the Cubs vs Mets game?

Pete Crow-Armstrong was the standout performer, going 2-for-5 with 1 RBI and delivering the walk-off RBI double in the 10th inning off Brooks Raley. For the Mets, Eric Wagaman hit a pinch-hit two-run home run, making him the most impactful individual offensive performer in the loss.

What were Freddy Peralta’s pitching stats on June 25, 2026?

Freddy Peralta pitched 5.2 innings, allowing 5 hits, 3 runs (all unearned), 1 walk, and 5 strikeouts on 98 pitches (54 strikes). His ERA actually dropped on the night, as none of the runs that scored were his responsibility — they came courtesy of Mets defensive errors.

Did Dansby Swanson have a big game for the Cubs?

Swanson went 0-for-4 on June 25 and did not drive in a run. However, he had been extraordinary in the series’ first three games, recording 15 RBIs — tying the Cubs’ all-time franchise record for any series of any length. His 0-for-4 in the finale underscored the Cubs’ lineup depth: they won without him contributing offensively.

What is Pete Crow-Armstrong’s season stats line heading into this game?

Entering the June 25 game, Crow-Armstrong was batting .287 with an OPS of .888, 45 RBIs, and had been one of the hottest players in the NL throughout June (.437 average, 9 HR, 14 RBI in the month). He had won two consecutive NL Player of the Week awards before the Cubs-Mets series began.

What does the Cubs’ 7–0 record against the Mets mean for the 2026 season series?

The Cubs outscored the Mets 51–24 across all seven meetings, going 4–0 in each series. It represents one of the most dominant head-to-head performances by any team in the 2026 NL regular season and effectively gives Chicago a maximum seven-game edge in any potential tiebreaker scenario involving New York.

Conclusion

The June 25 Mets vs Chicago Cubs match player stats tell the story of a game won by efficiency over volume. New York out-hit Chicago 9–6, launched two home runs to the Cubs’ zero, and walked six batters. None of it was enough. The Cubs allowed zero earned runs while their fielding and situational awareness manufactured four. Pete Crow-Armstrong delivered the dagger blow with ice-cold composure against his former franchise. Brooks Raley took the loss. The Mets left 22 runners on base and went home to face a deeper rebuild question — not of talent, but of execution.

When teams win without earning a single run — when defense, bullpen management, and one perfectly timed double are sufficient — it signals something beyond a good night. It signals a team with a system. The Chicago Cubs have a system. The New York Mets, in 2026 at least, are still searching for theirs.